Why pay decisions break down before they reach approval
Most bad pay outcomes are not bad judgement. They are decisions made without the context that already existed somewhere in the company.
Practitioner writing on pay decisions, ranges, internal equity and total rewards — written for lean Total Rewards teams at growing U.S. companies.
Most bad pay outcomes are not bad judgement. They are decisions made without the context that already existed somewhere in the company.
A range only works if the people using it believe it. Here is what erodes that belief, and how to build structure that survives contact with hiring.
Market data tells you what an outsider costs. Internal equity tells you what the offer will do to the people already doing the job.
Compression is rarely one bad decision. It is a series of individually reasonable ones, viewed together for the first time when someone resigns.
Posted ranges do not just change job ads. They change what your own employees can infer about their pay — and how fast they can infer it.
Most philosophy documents are aspirational. A useful one tells you what to do when two of your own principles disagree.
Off-cycle raises are where consistency quietly disappears. A simple framework keeps urgency from becoming precedent.
A promotion answers three different questions at once. Blurring them is why promotion increases feel arbitrary.
Comparing offers on base alone hides most of the decision. Here is how to reason about the whole package without pretending everything is cash.
Your HRIS records the outcome. The reasoning behind it usually survives only in someone's inbox — until they leave.







We're working with compensation and People leaders to refine Stratum around the decisions they handle every day.
Request access